If you’re an entrepreneur pitching your business plan to a group of investors, you can basically assume that a lot of people are going to hear your idea. Secrecy? Not a chance. And if you show up at a serious investment film wielding a non-disclosure agreement, chances are you’ll be laughed into next week. Still, should entrepreneurs expect some level of confidentiality when it comes to their idea?
Here’s why we ask: recently big-wig venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers accidentally published a list of ideas submitted by developers to their iFund, which provides investment to entrepreneurs working on iPhone apps. While the glitch was blamed on a former KPCB contractor who accidentally exported the database—with names, business plans, and a myriad of other critical information—to a public web server. Not surprisingly, many of the entrepreneurs who names and business plans were listed were angry. None more so perhaps than Aaron Greenspan, the head of Think Computer who’s taken to the Huffington Post to rant about what he says was KPCB’s egregious failure. While Greenspan has been embroiled with KPCB’s attorneys (and it seems that much of his angst stems from those interactions—which are admittedly bizarre), we have to wonder, does the fact that that information was posted really make that much of a difference? Sure, there’s the risk that another developer could potentially steal one of the ideas, yet so far that doesn’t appear to have happened. The worst thing that’s gone down is that Internet trolls have taken the concepts and have posted them for the public to vote on in various forums. Despite that, Greenspan submits that by having this information made public, that it effectively kills any shot he has at funding:
“Just as an individual’s Social Security Number, date of birth, and credit card number are all intended to be kept confidential and can easily be abused once in the public domain to the point where an individual’s ‘identity’ is rendered worthless, so too can a company’s business plan be subjected to similar abuses in the high-stakes world of institutional fundraising. By publishing the plans of several hundred companies, KPCB’s errant vendor all but extinguished the chances of those companies receiving funding for those ideas, whether from KPCB or any other firm. It also guaranteed that everyone in the database would be receiving even more e-mail spam than usual.”
Now we understand Greenspan’s concerns about his ability (or lack thereof) to receive funding—although we don’t quite understand why having the information made public would render him unable to secure a cent from an interested investor. But spam? Seriously? That’s one of the worst things that happened? Please, spend a day with our Outlook inbox and then tell us how bad your spam problem is.
We get that expecting privacy within a venture capital firm (you shouldn’t) is wildly different from expecting confidentiality from the public (you should). Still, it strikes us that more harm could be done, and actually has been, with credit card information.
While there’s no question that KCPB was decidedly in the wrong by accidentally posting ideas they were pitched, the question we have is whether the outcome was as disastrous as the entrepreneurs who are screaming about it actually let on. Idea secrecy is something many entrepreneurs hold near and dear, but we’re not convinced it’s as big of a deal as they make it seem. Tell us what you think in the comments section below.